Gan Xingba ([info]ganxingba) wrote,
@ 2008-01-24 00:00:00
Previous Entry  Add to memories!  Tell a Friend  Next Entry
The "Organization for Transformative Works" is Silly
So, there's this thing called the Organization for Transformative Works. They want to apparently archive and legitimize fan works. All right, fine. People have tried before, but that doesn't bug me. They also want to create a history of fandom. Again, no problem. However, from there, it gets odd. This is the second thing on their list of values (on their "About" page here):

2. We value our identity as a predominantly female community with a rich history of creativity and commentary.

Come again?

The OTW represents a practice of transformative fanwork historically rooted in a primarily female culture.


That so? Rooted in female culture? I find that odd, considering they view fan fiction, fan art and fan videos as "transformative works," which sounds pretty pretentious by the way. Like, Edith Wharton came up with that title pretentious. At any rate, I happen to have taken part in two of those aspects of fandom. I know a bit about it, particularly the fanvid part, and I can say with absolute confidence that a statement of it being "predominantly female" is ludicrous. There are as many male FMV makers as female. They've contributed as much to the history of fandom as females. For example, this little AMV, which gained fame before Youtube even existed, or of course the king of fandubs, LittleKuriboh, who blew open a whole new medium for fanworks.

Predominantly female? Rooted in female culture? Yeah, sure, if you exclude all parts of fandom outside of romantic fan fiction. Otherwise, the claim is ridiculous.

There, rant over. Continue with your regularly scheduled internets.



(Read 9 comments) - (Post a new comment)


[info]ganxingba
2008-01-24 11:23 pm UTC (link)
Oh, I've read the reasoning, but I find to be mostly rationalization. I've also noticed that while their mission statement mentions all levels of fanworks, including videos and fan art, most of their arguments for the history being "predominantly female" revert to fan fiction because, let's face it, that's where their arguments make the most sense.

Fan art, for example, dates back over a thousand years if you count religious works, and for better or worse, the majority of early "fan artists" in ancient times were male. More recently, comic books, a male dominated realm (which is often a bad thing ala Women in Refrigerators) sparked a huge fan art community as everyone tried to make their own super-hero comic, or just draw their own Superman or Batman adventure. If you include fan art, then to say it's "rooted in a primarily female culture" or the like is silly. Granted, it's equally silly to say it's rooted primarily in male culture, as there have and continue to be many, many influential female fan artists.

With fan fiction there is a little more logic to the statement, but while I could debate that too, that's not my main point. The point here is that OTW seems to be ignoring large fan work categories while at the same time claiming that they are representing them. If OTW is truly only talking about fan fiction then it needs to revise its mission statement big time.

That's just the first step, of course, but it needs to be done. OTW needs a firm identity if it wants its claims to be taken seriously.

(Reply to this) (Parent)


(Read 9 comments) - (Post a new comment)

Create an Account
Forgot your login or password?
Login w/ OpenID
English • Español • Deutsch • Русский…